tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15025768.post6952399594661151079..comments2023-10-06T08:44:08.452-04:00Comments on Blue Ohio Blog: One Dude Who Knew What He Was Talking AboutUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15025768.post-30849755523947666382009-03-26T18:54:00.000-04:002009-03-26T18:54:00.000-04:00Jeff,Thanks for the correction. The original vote ...Jeff,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the correction. The original vote on the senate bill was 54 to 44 along party lines. After the differences between the senate and house bills were resolved the final vote was 90 to 8. My bad. I'm still not happy Clinton signed the thing.Madrigal Maniachttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12908972418779609275noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15025768.post-49518496702351938272009-03-26T05:29:00.000-04:002009-03-26T05:29:00.000-04:00The vote wasn't along party lines. The article it...The vote wasn't along party lines. The article itself says only 8 senators voted against the bill.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15025768.post-56389879520984453652009-03-25T22:53:00.000-04:002009-03-25T22:53:00.000-04:00SpookySpookyJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06876759372832282581noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15025768.post-25924073967596131182009-03-25T22:42:00.000-04:002009-03-25T22:42:00.000-04:00That's amazing. Thanks for posting it. I'm still u...That's amazing. Thanks for posting it. I'm still upset with Clinton for signing the bill. The vote was along party lines and the Republican's didn't have a veto proof margin. However, Clinton bucked his own party and signed it anyway.Madrigal Maniachttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12908972418779609275noreply@blogger.com